In brief

Assess repeatable production against the whole cell sequence: part arrival, fixture location, handling or processing, inspection where required, and discharge. Use representative normal and difficult parts, record the current cycle, and trial the proposed changes with the connected equipment and recovery tasks included.

Compare the retained and changed scope using the same part and process brief. Robot motion time alone does not establish the complete production cycle or the number of accepted parts.

On the production floor

Plan for the conditions your team handles every day — Robot Cell Retrofits

Plan robot cell retrofits around your parts, process, cycle time, tooling, recovery and acceptance criteria. Discuss the highest-risk feasibility questions with Oxford Industrial Automation. For repeatable production using existing robot-cell upgrades, the deciding details include part, product and process variation for existing robot-cell upgrades, required cycle and production pattern and run-off criteria and production evidence.

Discuss your application
Your application

Details worth resolving early for repeatable production using existing robot-cell upgrades

Question 1

Part, Product and Process Variation for Existing Robot-Cell Upgrades

Provide representative normal and difficult parts, drawings and the new process requirements. Identify the changes from the current task and any existing limits that still need confirmation.

Question 2

Arrival Pattern and Presentation

Record how parts arrive, their orientation and variation, fixture location and the handover into the cell. Include credible irregular presentation in feasibility work.

Question 3

Required Cycle and Production Pattern

Measure the full current sequence and state the required production pattern. Include upstream/downstream waiting, process time and operator tasks when assessing the proposed cycle.

Question 4

Tooling, Sensing and Process Interfaces

List retained and changed tooling, fixtures, sensing, services and signal connections. Name each interface owner and the compatibility or trial evidence still needed.

Question 5

Operator Access, Recovery and Changeover

Map loading, clearing, maintenance, changeover and controlled recovery. Include access changes and identify affected functions for application-specific review.

Question 6

Run-Off Criteria and Production Evidence

Agree the expected accepted result, samples, repetitions, full-cycle record and difficult/fault scenarios. Keep configuration versions and unresolved discrepancies with the run-off evidence.

Your operating cycle

Plan for more than automatic running

Include replenishment, normal production, planned change, short stops, fault recovery, cleaning and maintenance for repeatable production using existing robot-cell upgrades. A fast automatic step can still leave your team with a slow or awkward overall process.

Prove the result

Test repeatable production using existing robot-cell upgrades against representative parts, tooling and difficult cycle conditions

Normal production

Run the agreed product or part mix for repeatable production using existing robot-cell upgrades at your intended operating pattern.

Difficult conditions

Include credible extremes for part, product and process variation for existing robot-cell upgrades and arrival pattern and presentation.

Fault and recovery

Show how the proposed solution detects a problem affecting repeatable production using existing robot-cell upgrades, responds safely, informs your team and restarts under control.

Important limits

Be clear about what the trial has shown

Compare with Retrofit or Flexible Cells Involving Existing Robot-Cell Upgrades if that operating pattern is closer to your application.